November 9, 2009

People Will Say We’re In Love

liveriga

Is it a typo or just brutal honesty?

Ainars Slesers seems to have become like Richard Rodgers – the member of not one notable collaboration but two. Just as Rodgers had his Hammerstein and his Hart, so Slesers has his original ‘Sleserkovs’ double act with Riga mayor Nils Usakovs, plus an increasingly important pairing with airBaltic straight man Bertolt Flick.

It was the latter dynamic duo in the limelight in Riga today to unveil the latest developments in their ‘Live Riga’ tourist promotion campaign.

Whatever you say about Slesers (and whatever you say won’t be nearly as comprehensive as what Slesers says about Slesers) press conferences featuring the self-styled “bull***er*” of Latvian politics are usually worth attending. This one was no exception, the highlight being when Flick lambasted the media for “destructive and amoral journalism” largely because they kept asking who was paying, how much they were paying and where the money was coming from.

But first to the Live Riga (pronounced, er, “Leave Riga”) campaign itself, which features pictures of a dismembered Cyclopean heart running around various Riga landmarks.

It’s the sort of thing that looks likely to give imaginative children a sleepless night – but it’s supposed to appeal to foreigners in seven markets when it is combined with the strapline “You may leave, your heart stays.” Given the recent stories about desperate Latvians trying to sell various internal organs to raise cash, this hit an unintentionally topical note.

The other slogan spearheading the campaign also contains some unfortunate double entendre. “Easy to go, hard to leave” suggests the phrase used by The League Of Gentlemen to promote the hellish town of Royston Vaysey: “You’ll Never Leave.”

Incidentally, it is rumoured that that slogan was itself based on a similar piece of sloganeering used in my own home town, Gloucester, which was rather abruptly pulled once the serial killer Fred West was discovered to be burying bodies in his basement.

Flick’s criticism of the media was unfortunate. Clarity and transparency of budget and benefits is all that is required rather than talk of “synergies” and hoped-for collaborations that will create added value at some point in the future. It also sat a little uneasily with Flick and Slesers’ repeated statements that a lot of money was being spent on bringing in dozens of foreign journalists, putting them up for the night and taking them out to the opera to show Riga off properly.

But it should be admitted that Flick and Slesers also made some valid points. For years, Latvia has been poor at promoting itself in a consistent and professional manner. Efforts have rarely been sustained or integrated in the way that Estonia has managed via its Enterprise Estonia agency.

That’s primarily because vested interests and political patronage have stymied efforts to produce anything cohesive – so when primo oligarch Slesers crops up in yet another semi-official attempt to become the voice of the Latvian tourist industry, it’s hardly surprising if there is a certain amount of scepticism, not to say cynicism.

So the best thing Slesers and his partners can do is to keep their promise to work hard to bring more tourists to Riga while doing their best to also spread the benefits beyond their own commercial interests. Between them they have good organizational skills, great contacts and plenty of drive – if they can show they are genuinely interested in promoting Riga over themselves, they will deserve wider support for their efforts.

airBaltic seems to be providing the lion’s share of the funding by combining its marketing budget with the Live Riga budget, but in order to justify itself as a force for economic good in general rather than just economic enrichment of approved partners, Live Riga needs to come up with much more than slogans, logos and a h0tel booking engine.

Flick and Slesers said they were open to creative criticism and would welcome suggestions. If they take some of those on board – even suggestions from the “amoral” media perhaps – they might do themselves some good and do Riga some good at the same time.

(* “bulldozer” in case you were thinking of something else)

November 5, 2009

Now THAT’S What I Call A Bail-Out

…and the UK thinks it can lecture Latvia in what’s politically acceptable?!

Looking in my inbox this morning, what should I find, but an email from Gordon Brown himself. It seems he and foreign secretary David Moribund are in cahoots to cheat British taxpayers out of yet more cash, not satisfied with charging interior decoration and cleaning services to expenses.

In the best journalistic traditions, I will of course immediately place the full text of this disgraceful despatch into the public domain. Speaking of domains, the security services would be well advised to check out why David Millipede thinks it necessary to have an email address in Armenia.

OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR CIVIL SERVICE, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM.

Our ref: ATM/13470/IDR Your ref:…

Date: 04/11/2009

IMMEDIATE PAYMENT NOTIFICATION

I am The Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP,Prime Minister British Government. This letter is to officially inform you that (ATM Card Number 048000101775550) has been accredited with your favor. Your Personal Identification Number is 477.The VISA Card Value is £2,000,000.00(Two Million, Great British Pounds Sterling). This office will send to you an Visa/ATM CARD that you will use to withdraw your funds in any ATM MACHINE CENTER or Visa card outlet in the world with a maximum of £5000 GBP daily.

Further more,You will be required to re-confirm the following information to enable;The Rt Hon David Miliband MP Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Office. begin in processing of your VISA CARD.

(1)Full names: (2)Address: (3)Country: (4)Nationality: (5)Phone #: (6)Age: (7)Occupation: (8) Post Codes

Forward Reply To:hondavidmiliband@8.am

TAKE NOTICE: That you are warned to stop further communications with any other person(s) or office(s) different from the staff of the State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs to avoid hitches in receiving your payment.

Regards, The Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP Prime Minister

October 25, 2009

Friends & Neighbours

Three seats, but one is hotter than the others

Three seats, but one is hotter than the others

The vote of confidence is a well-known phenomenon in the world of football management.

After a run of a dozen dismal matches, the board of a club will get together and stage such a vote which will be carried unanimously, followed by the issuance of statement saying the manager “retains our full confidence” and “has a long term future at this club.”

Two matches later they generally sack him if he hasn’t already jumped.

The reason I mention this is not because of any particular interest in which football manager is next for the guillotine, but because a lot of the encouragement currently being lavished on Latvia has the distinct ring of boardroom-type support to it.

First Estonia and now Lithuania are trying to make it clear to the rest of the world that they’d really rather not be bracketed along with Latvia if it’s all the same. Yes, a look at the charts on economic recession, unemployment and budget deficits might make it look like all three Baltic states are experiencing pretty much the same phenomenon (albeit to different degrees) but the increasingly clear message is “Please don’t confuse us with poor Latvia – though of course we have full confidence in its long-term future.”

As previously noted on this blog Estonia sensed this was necessary early on by offering to contribute to Latvia’s international bail-out package (an offer then-Latvian-PM Godmanis gruffly rejected, aware of the signal it sent out). Estonia established itself among the donor caste while Latvia became an untouchable charity case.

A somewhat less subtle bit of theatre came last week when the editor of Estonia’s Aripaev newspaper wrote a public letter to the Swedish banks asking them to please refrain from referring to “the Baltics” as it might give the impression Estonia has something in common with Latvia [my paraphrasing].

At this weekend’s Riga Conference, discussions were supposed to begin with the topic Recovery from the Recession in the Baltics. However, listening to it in the Small Guild with portraits of yesteryear’s wealthy Baltic German burgomeisters staring down from the walls, it sounded rather more like Recession in Latvia – Why Estonia Is Doing So Much Better.

The next day the big guns were wheeled into town in the contrasting shapes of the Estonian and Lithuanian presidents. Dalia Grybauskaite wasted no time in grabbing the underperforming conference by the lapels, shaking it violently and telling it to pull itself together and do something useful, much as she is doing with her country.

“Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia are full members of the Alliance and active security providers participating in NATO’s operation in Afghanistan and other missions. Therefore, we deserve to have security guarantees and concrete defense plans for our countries.” – President Dalia Grybauskaite

Her demand to NATO was the only whiff of a headline wafting around Riga all weekend, provided you ignored a slip by the Latvian defence minister in which he apparently gave away classified information (you can’t get the staff…).

Where Grybauskaite was direct to the point of bluntness, Estonia’s President Ilves remained as urbane and deft of touch as ever with his pronouncements. On the face of things he said nothing of particular interest, but scratch at his words a bit and a few interesting nuances glint through.

His official press release notes: “Presidents Ilves and Zatlers recognized that the financial and economic situations in the Baltic countries differ, that the problems of the three countries are dissimilar, although the successes and failures of each country affect the reputation of the entire region.”

Ilves also went out of his way to stress the importance of the Baltic Sea Strategy, which involves all the countries around the Baltic littoral. How much better to be regarded as a Baltic Sea State along with Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Finland etc rather than a mere Baltic State shackled to Lithuania and Latvia?

Expect to see Estonia moving further in this direction from now on – it wouldn’t surprise me if every time someone mentions the Baltic states from now on, a helpful Estonian will pop up to explain why the term Baltic Sea States is actually much more modern and useful.

To finish where we started, how about this:

“I am sure that Latvia will be able to solve its own problems. I believe in Latvia. Latvia is not alone with its worries. Estonia and Lithuania, as well as the entire European Union, stand by it as firm allies.” – President Toomas Hendrik Ilves

If that doesn’t have the ring of a confidence vote about it, I don’t know what does.